摘要

加州隐私保护机构推出的‘责任在你’隐私活动引发学者质疑。《隐私权之限》（Notre Dame Law Review，2023）作者Daniel J. Solove指出，将隐私保护重担压给个人存在三大问题：企业系统而非个人选择是隐私伤害的主因；个人难以应对海量组织的数据管理；数据生态的互联性让个人选择产生广泛影响。Solove批评权利框架制造‘隐私秀’，让用户背锅而企业免责。有效保护需立法直接约束企业数据行为，而非让个体承担不可能的任务。结论强调，隐私责任应由数据处理方和监管机构承担，不应推给处于数字权力结构弱势的消费者。

The California Privacy Protection Agency's new "The ball is in your court" privacy campaign faces scholarly criticism. Daniel J. Solove, author of "The Limitations of Privacy Rights" (Notre Dame Law Review, 2023), argues that emphasizing individual responsibility for privacy protection is flawed. He identifies three systemic issues: 1) Most privacy harms stem from corporate systems, not personal choices 2) Individuals lack capacity to manage data across countless organizations 3) Interconnected data ecosystems make personal decisions collectively consequential. Solove asserts that rights-based frameworks create ineffective "privacy theater," shifting blame to users while exempting data-driven corporations. True protection requires legislative action to regulate corporate data practices directly, rather than delegating responsibility to overwhelmed individuals. The critique concludes that privacy accountability belongs with data processors and regulators, not consumers navigating inherently unequal digital power structures.